Jake Mangum and the Pirates’ cone mystery: 5 clues behind a new dugout ritual

The Jake Mangum chatter around the Pirates’ dugout is less about a player move than a symbol now passing through the club’s daily routine. What began as an odd object seen during the last game against the Reds has turned into a small but revealing test of how baseball traditions form in public view. Pitching ace Paul Skenes addressed the trend Thursday on the Pat McAfee Show, and his comments only deepened the curiosity. The result is a dugout story that sits at the intersection of humor, identity, and an unanswered question about what the cone actually represents.
Why the cone is now part of the Pirates conversation
The immediate backdrop is simple: the Pirates appear to have started a new dugout tradition, described internally and by fans as “hoisting the cone. ” That phrase gained traction after the cone was seen during the team’s last game against the Reds. Skenes described it as something that has been used a lot recently, suggesting the object has moved quickly from novelty to habit.
What makes the story stick is not a dramatic on-field moment, but the uncertainty around meaning. Skenes said he does not know the story behind the cone, even while acknowledging that several teammates may end up hoisting it this season. He also said Cruz wore it a couple of times and “looked like he was at Hogwarts, ” a line that reinforces the tone of the moment: playful, strange, and not fully explained.
Jake Mangum and the search for meaning
The phrase Jake Mangum enters this story as part of the wider fan and team discussion around the cone’s identity. The curiosity is not centered on statistics or roster movement; it is centered on how a small object can become a team marker without a public explanation. That is why the image drew so much attention when a sports gear company was seen selling a “Hoist the Cone” shirt.
From there, the speculation broadened. Some wondered whether it was a misprint. Others asked whether it was meant to read “Hoist the Colors. ” Another theory linked it to the Pittsburgh Cone from 2019, a waffle cone special filled with kielbasa, pierogi, Swiss cheese, and more. No explanation has been confirmed in the material at hand, which is exactly why the story has spread: the less certain the meaning, the more it invites interpretation.
The road in Cincinnati and the power of team folklore
Skenes offered one concrete detail: he believes the cone spotted in the dugout was picked up by one of his teammates on the side of the road in Cincinnati earlier this week. That detail matters because it shifts the object from a possible promotional item into something that sounds improvised, spontaneous, and team-owned. In baseball culture, those are often the ingredients that turn a joke into a ritual.
This is where Jake Mangum becomes part of a larger pattern rather than a separate fact. The cone itself may be the real story, but the way people talk about it shows how quickly dugout folklore can develop. Once an object gains a nickname, a shirt, and a repeated act of placement, it stops being random. It becomes a symbol that players can use to signal mood, momentum, or simply shared amusement.
What experts and institutions show about sports symbols
No named outside expert is quoted in the available material, but the public record here is still useful. Fanatics’ sales of the “Hoist the Cone” shirt show how quickly a clubhouse curiosity can become merchandise. Pittsburgh Clothing Co. ’s public question on X also shows how fan businesses can amplify uncertainty rather than settle it. The thread between those two examples is clear: once a symbol reaches the marketplace, its meaning becomes part of the product.
Paul Skenes’ remarks are important because they establish the limits of insider knowledge. He did not present the cone as a strategic signal or formal club tradition with a written origin story. Instead, he framed it as something being carried forward because it has been used a lot recently. That makes the phenomenon less about explanation and more about repetition.
Regional reach and the fan response
In Pittsburgh, the cone is now a small cultural puzzle with outsized reach. It connects a dugout habit, a road-side origin story in Cincinnati, and a wave of fan interpretation that stretches from humor to branding. The larger implication is that modern sports symbols do not need a formal rollout to matter. They can emerge from a single sighting, gain a slogan, and then travel through social conversation fast enough to become part of the team’s image.
For the Pirates, that is both harmless and useful. A playful ritual can build connection even when no one can fully explain it. For fans, the mystery is the point. Jake Mangum may be part of the conversation now, but the deeper question remains the same: if nobody knows exactly what the cone means, how long before that uncertainty becomes the tradition itself?



